Saturday, June 3, 2023

Misgendered and Mistergendered

 I am a clean-shaven adult male-identifying human who sometimes misses a few haircut cycles. My hair grows out and its stems tickle my collar and cover portions of my ears.

Over longer spans of time, other aspects of my persona have experienced alterations. My body has gradually morphed from washboard to egg plant. (Okay, it was never washboard, but you could count my ribs when I was 10). My height has morphed from five-four to five-three. The nurse who measured my height before my annual physical said I was five-two and three quarters, but she’s an effing liar.

Here’s my point. When I proceed to a restaurant or grocery checkout line, the person designated to serve my needs will invariably say something like, “Can I help you, ma’am?”

Here’s my actual point, and I deserve enormous respect for submitting to the humiliation of revealing all this just to make said point, which is: I have been misgendered, and more than once.

When it happens I don my deepest Some Enchanted Evening voice and say something like, “Excuse me?” The gratifying result is usually a panicky and profuse apology. Most perpetrators see this misstep as massive; I’ve had distraught waiters issue multiple apologies throughout dinner.

My thirst for revenge is seldom quenched, which is a shame because in none of these instances is the offense anything other than an error. I can only imagine my reaction if the offender misgendered me with malice, if that person knew I was male and called me madam to mock me.

Still, after absorbing such a taunt, I’d get a haircut and go smoothly back into my heteronormative existence unscathed. Not everyone who is maliciously misgendered gets to do this.

A state lawmaker from Missoula, Montana (where I once lived), is zestfully misgendered by other legislators or was until she was banished for using colorful language to promulgate the truth that laws targeting transgender persons will result in fatalities. The banished official, Zooey Zephyr, is herself transgender.

It has become a source of, well, pride for transphobic folks to misgender trans citizens whenever the opportunity arises. These bigots have used all the power they can muster to attack, harass, and legislate against the trans community in state after state. Their objective is clear: erase this segment of our population by any means possible.

This is being done in the usual three-step fashion: demean, demonize, and destroy. The well worn formula was used to eradicate our indigenous peoples: call them stupid and unworthy; deem them terminally immoral, murderous, and cursed; wipe them out.

The same three-step process of erasure has been used on every group deemed unworthy to exist by those in power. The lives, the very presence of our beloved transgender brothers, sisters, friends, citizens is in jeopardy throughout the land.

They are a small minority of our population, easy to wipe out if we put our minds to it. We who cherish them, we who treasure their lives, we who wish them peace and joy. we all must stand up, lock arms, and build a shield of love around them.

Face down the eradicators, tell them no, not here, not now, not with these beautiful ones we are blessed to have among us. We will see to it that they forever enjoy the right to life, to liberty, to the pursuit of their happiness. 

Happy Pride Month, 2023!


Thursday, December 17, 2020

Once Lost

Seven empty weeks had passed, and I couldn’t turn off that big fat L blinking like a neon sign in the front of my brain. It gave me vertigo. It told me the improbable happens, sure winners can lose by a nose or, in this case, .4 percent. Blinkety blink, you lousy loser. Blinkety blink.
   My wife said forget it, but then her face wore the smile she reserved only for happy occasions, and that told me she didn’t have an expression for this occasion. The staff said a million things, all of them containing the words “next time.” The only one who had the good sense not to talk couldn’t. It was a college kid I saw a lot of in the last weeks, a believer. He couldn’t talk because he was sobbing. First campaign — they never believe losing is one of the possibilities.
   I didn’t cry. In America only winners get to cry. Losers stiffen the upper lip and concede. Every politician’s favorite word: concede. Our system doesn’t leave us any other choice. We replaced monarchy with majority. They are king; they wield the scepter. And when they whack you in the rear end with it, you feel it. And when it hurts the most, you freeze your upper lip and concede. To them.
   Just before midnight put the knife in election day, I made a solemn promise. I wouldn’t read a single news site, blog, opinionator, or pundit about my defeat. I awoke next day at six AM, turned on my laptop and read every word I could find. At least it wasn’t a campaign promise.
   Every writer knew exactly what I did wrong to snatch defeat from the yawning jaws of victory. Courted the press too little. Or too much. Aligned myself too closely to the party. Or was too independent of the party. Compromised my vaunted principles. Or was too inflexible. When you and 49.6% of the voters end up on the short side of the equation, you were wrong and the 50.4% were right. It’s the unassailable logic of democracy.
   This day, seven weeks later, I took a walk. “It’s Christmas Eve,” my wife reminded me. “Your sisters are coming by at 8.”
   “Fine, see you then.” It came out hollow, not angry, though I was as angry as George Bailey. All I lacked was a cute kid trying to play a carol on the old piano and driving me nuts. No one even cared if I embezzled campaign funds. Losers rarely get investigated. What would be the point?
   It was dusk when I left the condo but freezer-chest dark and cold when I reached the outskirts of a neighborhood I knew better than to enter alone. Or not alone. But what did it matter? What if I got mugged and beaten up? Why should I care? What near death experience could be worse than losing that election?
   Less than a half hour later, I was mugged and beaten up. Turns out I cared a lot. For one thing, I realized almost instantly that a close electoral loss was not a near death experience now that I was having one.
   The two gentlemen who approached me quite justifiably determined that I was a Christmas bonanza beyond anything they deserved, and they lost no time rushing home with their treasures. First, of course, they brandished a hand gun, pushed the barrel into my skull, and suggested I do nothing that could be categorized as stupid. Frozen with fear, I did nothing but tremble. I wasn’t this scared during combat.
   I awoke, sort of, aware that I was no longer frozen with fear — just frozen — lying on cement, bent double and looking at a shadowy version of old combat boots near my nose.
   “Stay still.” A woman, and she spoke with authority. Not that moving was something I was actually contemplating. “You’ve been messed with. I think your nose is broke. Did they kick you in the ribs?” “Yes.” That was me. I could talk. And I knew they had kicked me in the ribs, though to this day I don’t remember it. I’d find out later two of those ribs were bruised not broken. The wimps. My vision was blurry. I was dizzy.
   “I know a place,” she said. Uncommonly strong, she lifted me to my feet, placed my hand around her shoulder and avoided the bruised ribs as she helped me stagger about two blocks. A street light told me she had dark hair cropped close to her head. She wore fatigues, military issue, the name patch torn off. I took note of the way her left sleeve was rolled. She was a Marine.
   It was a noisy Christmas Eve in the shelter where she gently deposited me onto a small but sturdy cot. A couple of itchy woolen blankets helped thaw me out. The room was not so much spinning as lurching up and down as if I were viewing it from a pogo stick.
   It began settling soon enough, and I matched the noises with dozens of down-and-outers milling and chatting, many eating a plate of steaming something they held in one hand as they walked about. The young woman who had brought me here reappeared and began bandaging whatever was cut, bashed or bruised about my head and face. I would end up with a full turban and a covering over my right eye.
   “What’s you name, Marine?” I asked the Jarhead. “Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett, sir,” she said smartly as she expertly wrapped me up.
   “I’m Major Villner, Sergeant. Seen action?”
   “Nineteen months in Iraq, sir.” “I served two tours there.”
   I noticed another space on her uniform where a medal once hung. “You were decorated.”
   “Bronze Star for Valor, sir.” She shifted her weight to let me know this was not a topic she was comfortable with.
   “What are you doing around here, Gunnery Sergeant?” 
    “I live here, sir. You are in my cot.” “Sorry, Gunnery Sergeant.” It seemed important to show her due respect for her former rank.
   “Thank you for your help.”
   She walked out of my line of vision, and inside 30 seconds two elderly men stopped by and spoke with sufficient incoherence to alert me that they were not entirely in their right mind. I wished them a Merry Christmas, and both seemed confused as they departed.
   I looked past them and saw a long table where the food was being doled out vigorously by smiling men and women. Above them, on the wall was a sign that read, “Live frugally; love wastefully.” I turned my head to one side and gasped loudly.
   An old woman’s face was positioned not two inches from me; we were precisely nose to nose, as she had bent down and cocked her head until it was parallel to mine. She beamed a smile that revealed a full set of even, white teeth, real ones. I gathered what wits I possessed, and I readied myself for her addition to this unique holiday experience. She backed away a bit, and I saw that she wore a dark blue overcoat and carried a multi-colored carpetbag on her arm.
   “You’re lost,” she said.
   I was still a little off. I must have thought she said “you lost,” because I answered, “Yeah, by less than half a percent.”
   She made sense of it. “You’re more lost than that. Here.”
   She reached deep into her carpetbag, withdrew a well-creased card and gave it to me. I looked at it, a Christmas card.
   “From my son.”
   I held it up. “He’s away?”
   “In Afghanistan. Helping people find their way.” A chaplain, I guessed.
   The front of the card bore a drawing of a manger with the infant in it. Lying in the straw at its side was Mary, her eyes closed, her face betraying exhaustion and pain. Joseph was on his feet, his back to the scene, his face in his hand, as if he was embarrassed. Below the disturbing picture, in a lovely font, were these words: A stable is not really a good idea.
   Inside the card, in a lovely font, was inscribed: Love the poor; hate the poverty. A handwritten note appeared at the bottom. “Much to hate. Still more to love. Ozzie.”
   I handed the odd card back to her. “Looks like I’m coming away from this with a whole new set of Holiday clichés. How long has Ozzie been over?”
   “His whole life.”
   Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett returned with bowl of hot broth. She sat and began spooning it into my mouth. She was careful not to singe the swollen upper lip. Or the swollen lower lip. She squinted like a seamstress threading a needle, then grinned as she emptied the spoonful onto my tongue.
   “You have a nice smile, Gunnery Sergeant. You should let people see more of it.”
   A second splash of the surprisingly delicious broth found its mark.
   “Nobody sees it.”
   “I did.”
   “I’m glad. Damn.” She spilled a drop onto my lip, and I winced. She suddenly looked about to cry.
   “Hey, Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett. You are not perfect. None of us is perfect. You are performing at or above expectations.”
   She calmed. “Yes, Major. My hand shakes sometimes, sir.”
   “How long have you been down here, Gunnery Sergeant?”
   “I don’t know, sir. I get blackouts and lose myself. I live here, take care of the guys.” She nodded toward a gaggle of cots where four or five men in disheveled military garb sat, apparently playing cards.
   “You take care of them?”
   “Like you, sir.” Another grin. For a moment, she displayed a wisp of the childlike features she once boasted.
   “No way they’re as dumb as I was strolling into that neighborhood.”
   “No, sir.” Now the grin took on an aspect that told me no one could be as dumb as I was. She gave me a last dose of the hot liquid, looked toward the door and said, “Oh, man, here come the ten minute do gooders.”
   There was a bustle at the entrance. A cadre of photogs, cameras clicking backed into the shelter, followed by one man with a communications backpack and a video camera and another with a mike pointed to the object of all the attention, who made an impressive entry.
   It was her, the Victor over me in the election. She was doing what victors do when they want to show their constituency what caring human beings they are — at least one day a year. Doing, let’s face it, exactly what I would have done.
   Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett had slipped away in disgust, but I was not left alone. The old woman with the blue overcoat and colorful carpetbag stood beside me and looked over at the Victor. “She’s lost.”
   I looked at the old woman. “She’s right where she wants to be.” She placed a wrinkled finger upon my cheek, the unbandaged one. “You are where you ought to be.”
   “So, I’m not lost after all.”
   “No,” she said, looking me in the eye. “You once were lost, but now. Not now.” She left before the debate could be concluded. I never saw her again.
   At that moment the Victor and her entourage approached the Gunnery Sergeant’s cot. She split eye contact between the camera and my well-disguised face. She was uncannily adroit at showing deep concern without actually coming close to touching me. She spoke as if we were in mid-discussion. “Please get well and have a blessed Christmas.”
   “Oh,” I said. “I am much better.” Then I called her by name. Her first name. It was about the meanest thing I could have done. She looked at me like Norma Desmond in the final scene of Sunset Boulevard and hustled on. The whole motley crew was gone in five minutes, and things settled down.
   Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett appeared beside a thirty-something white man with thick black hair and wearing a spotted butcher’s apron. “Sir, this is Rabbi Gold. He runs this place.”
   “Rabbi Gold? Where’s the frankincense and myrrh?” I guess it was a good day to be dumb.
   The Rabbi smiled indulgently. “Merry Christmas. Feeling better?”
   “I guess I feel about how I look. Thanks for the help.”
   “Thank Miss Dunsett here. She’s found folks in worse shape than you and brought them here. See those soldiers over there?”
   “Yeah.”
   “Miss Dunsett found those lost souls, too. Every one of them. They are all vets. All homeless, out of luck and out of options. ”
   “So,” I said looking at her lowered eyes. “Still serving her country.”
   “Yes, sir,” she said. “Of course, sir.”
   Rabbi Gold put a hand on her shoulder. “Long after her country abandoned her. Miss Dunsett has a number of medical issues stemming from combat, including a pretty severe head injury that causes some problems. But she does what she can.”
   She blushed just a little and flashed that beautiful grin for a split second. A brain aneurism took her from us on New Year’s Day, but not before she had found two more lost souls in tattered fatigues and coaxed them to the shelter.
   The Rabbi and I made sure she was given full military honors. Gunnery Sergeant Dunsett was buried in uniform with her Bronze Star, found among her meager effects.
   We have become good friends, Rabbi Gold and I. He still heads up a synagogue in the suburbs but spends all the time he can at the shelter. So do I, now. After two years, the Dunsett Foundation for Lost Veterans is building an impressive endowment. My wife works as hard as I do at it. Our motto, “Live frugally; Love wastefully,” now adorns the two additional shelters we’ve opened in the city.
   Funny thing about losing, being lost. You get a chance to come up with a whole new definition of winning. And if you’re really lost and really lucky, you might get to be found by a Gunnery Sergeant who knows the way and is strong enough to get you there.

 

Sunday, July 5, 2020

Pride, Deadly or Alive

Let’s talk about being proud. It’s something Americans are exceptionally good at. Sure, pride is the first deadly sin, but what the hell, pride is always a matter to shout about, and proud rhymes with loud, right?

I don’t know where the pride mania came from, but it resonates in opposite corners of the political wrestling ring. Raucous Proud to Be an American rallies feature duded up cattle-ropin’ cowboys, while June, Pride Month, gathered bellowing LGBTQ+ folks in equally colorful costumes, including the cowboy variety. Not that there’s any contradiction there.

Pride is clearly a popular notion enjoying a high level of social approval. Except perhaps among Trappist monks and the Amish, although I’m betting even they worry about it when they learn that they prosecute the purest form of their faith.

First, a definition. Pride as a culturally affirmed phenomenon refers to the conviction that I need not be at all shy about some aspect of myself, that this aspect is to be celebrated, that people who do not realize this are the lesser for it.

When I come upon other members of my “pride,” people like me who are also proud of the alikeness, I high-five them and shout witty epithets, like, “Yeah!!” with at least two exclamation points. I might even hold up a placard proclaiming the pride I feel. Or wear a baseball cap with a similar proclamation. I might appropriate a color or a rainbow of colors to signify my pride.

When theologians talk about pride, the deadly sin, they set it opposite humility, because pride the sin is a declaration that I am special, extra deserving, super endowed, and I’m totally worthy of all that. Humility is seen as a recognition that this declaration is false. I’m not a special recipient of God’s favor; God’s grace is showered freely.

When LGBTQ+ folks or black folks talk about pride, they do not see its opposite as humility; they see its opposite as shame. This turns out to be a significant difference. Pride here is a potent way of saying, “I don’t care if you like what I am or not, I won’t be feeling bad about it.” More positively, I am professing that it’s actually pretty wonderful being who I am.

This self-affirming sort of pride can coexist with pride the sin, but it is also consistent with the virtue of humility. I can be black and proud and yet humbly acknowledge my debt to fighters before me who made my pride possible, Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman, John Lewis, countless ancestors who endured and rebelled and made the strides that have brought us here.

I can be LGBTQ+ and proud, yet humblhy gaze down to see those on whose shoulders I stand, the Stonewall rebels, Harvey Milk, Megan Rapinoe, Pete Buttigieg, whose courage make pride not only possible but impossible to contain.

Still, pride, the sin, can slither into the picture. Any concept that ends up with “I am better than you” runs the risk of going deadly. From such tendencies evolve evils like white supremacy and heteronormative hegemony. The truths we hold as self-evident involve the idea that we are all created equal, all endowed with rights from which no one can be alienated, all granted access to justice at every moment of our lives.

Those principles drive from my life any sense of shame clouding my self-portrait and leave ample space for humility as I contemplate my equal, not superior, status with all humanity. Of this I can be proud, proud that I and my kind have finally grown to the mature acknowledgement that our common bond is far stronger than any deadly saber or deadly sin can divide. Out of many, we are one.

Monday, June 1, 2020

Not to Understand Is to Understand

I was in my twenties when I asked my mother this question: How is it that all my family are prejudiced, and I’m not? Exasperated might describe the look she shot my way as she raised her voice to answer.

“You are as prejudiced as the rest of us.”

I do not know what response I expected, but that wasn’t it. I saw myself as an outlier in my family. I had marched for civil rights. I even organized and spoke at a memorial procession at my alma mater, Villanova, the day after Dr. King was killed.

Mom, as always, saw the deeper reality. I have pondered the truth of her pronouncement throughout my life and have recently had cause to ponder anew.

Cops were an integral presence in my childhood. I knew the Darby police by name. Two of my favorites were Howard and Ted. Yes, we called them by their first names, a remarkable practice in a world where my best friend’s mom was Mrs. Courtney, my teacher was Sister, priests were Father. None of their first names were even known to me.

But the cops were Ted and Howard. It was their last names I didn’t know. I spoke often to them as they manned the intersection at Main and MacDade, manually working the busy stoplight. A different time, definitely.

Both were tall, but while Ted was beefy and sported a pugnacious Jay Leno chin, Howard was trim well turned out, handsome. Both smiled readily. Both made friendly conversation as I stopped at their corner on my way to school.

Ted was white, and Howard was black. To me these were descriptive facts, like Ted’s chin and Howard’s ready smile. The first name basis implied a kind of intimacy but not an absence of respect. To this child these men were symbols of a world determined to keep me safe, secure. If they told me to do something, or not to, I was convinced it was only to protect me. They were guardians of my well-being.

I would not have called them heroes. That silly word would await our era where we must prove our appreciation with inflated honorifics. Still, to me cops meant protection, freedom from worry, freedom from fear. Freedom. I certainly did appreciate them, welcome their presence and constancy.

As far as I knew, everyone felt the same.

I know better (or worse) now.

Even then, I knew about disparate treatment at the hands of police. An incident occurred when I was perhaps 11 or 12 that confirmed for me that black suspects were frequently beaten by police as punishment for getting caught. Whites, of course, experienced no such retaliation. I didn’t know the word “systemic” back then.

Dr. King tried to explain to us, us whites. He didn’t have to explain to black folk. Did anyone have to explain to my young self what it’s like to feel protected by the police? It was my daily experience. Likewise, no one has to describe to black men a world where the police are a potential life threatening presence.

These are wildly different views of the same societal reality: local law enforcement. Both views are rooted in lived experience, mine of safety affirmed, theirs of danger imminent. I am amazed that I cannot relate to someone seeing a cop as a direct threat to life and limb.

More amazing is the thought that a black man cannot know what it is like to approach a cop and experience a feeling of security and protection, will never say, “Hi Ted” or “Hi Howard.” After viewing the video of the Nine Minute Murder, I can see how impossible such a thing might be.

Robert C. O’Brien, the president’s national security advisor, claimed that the president wanted “peaceful protesters who have real concerns about brutality and racism…They need to be able to petition their government and let their voices be heard.”

This is false. A group of high profile black men, not long ago, did exactly as O’Brien wished and staged the most peaceful protest in our nation’s history to call attention to “brutality and racism.” These men simply knelt for two minutes in complete silence. They were unusually large men who, in a different context could be seen as quite threatening.

They were NFL football players, protesting exactly as O’Brien recommended. The president then expressed his views on their peaceful two minute kneeling demonstration. He called them thugs. He demanded their bosses fire them and taunted the bosses as cowards for not doing so. He said the protesters were un-American because they used the playing of the National Anthem as the setting for their protest.

If they were heard instead of reviled, perhaps further deaths could have been prevented. Perhaps the Nine Minute Murder of George Floyd would not have happened. We’ll never know, of course, because the bosses caved, the organizer of the protest was indeed fired and blackballed from the game, and, once again, the networks went to commercial during the playing of the National Anthem, as was their practice before the protest.

Now peaceful protest coexists with violent actions. The president and his Attorney General blame weak-willed Democratic leaders in beleaguered cities. They blame vague left wing groups like “Antifa.” They blame thugs. Not a single member of this administration thus far has taken any responsibility for the unrest.

I understand, Mr. Trump, Mr. O’Brien. I am guessing your experience of cops was similar to mine. The Nine Minute Murder by a uniformed policeman, surrounded by a phalanx of fellow cops, is utterly unthinkable. You would have denied it was possible right up until you viewed the video.

In O’Brien’s telling, bad cops like those four comprise literally .1% of all police on the force. He might be convincing to people like me whose experience of local law enforcement is as benign as mine has been. It is exactly what I want to believe, what I wish were true, what was in fact true for me. Nothing systemic going on here. Just a little aberration. Erase that terrible video and go on about your lives. Remember, folks, there are black cops also serving on those forces.

I think of Howard the cop, the black man I admired as a child. I knew nothing of him beyond his warm smile, inviting small talk, comforting uniformed presence. I saw him as a “colored man,” but that was solely because of the color of his skin. I mainly saw him as a policeman, and that was because he behaved with dedication and honor.

What I’ll never know is the daily price he paid to remain dedicated, to retain his honor, in a world far less dedicated to his well-being than he was to mine. Long after his passing, I learned how revered he was in Darby’s black community. Of course, what I wasn’t aware of they knew all too well.

I suppose in some cases, the word hero isn’t hyperbole at all.

Friday, February 23, 2018

Before the Hovering Helicopters


-->
Before the Hovering Helicopters
Orlando R. Barone

My daughter called the other day. Her 11-year-old son was experiencing troubles with his travel team swim coach. Parents in the know are already alerted. He is a very good swimmer; he is on a travel team, which means his parents chauffeur him long distances to meets.

The travel team habit is also expensive. Membership is exclusive and not cheap. Kids are expected to perform in a highly competitive environment. Participation trophies are nonexistent. If you’re not good enough, you sit the bench.

This notion of youth sports is the polar opposite of my boyhood experiences. If I felt like engaging in youth sports, I’d grab my scuffed, worn football and head up to Johnny’s house, then to Mike’s and Moose’s, then off to the 14th Street playground to find similarly inclined kids for a game of two-hand touch.

We used shirts to mark the sidelines and goal lines, did a finger throw (odds or evens) to determine who’d receive the kickoff, reviewed the rules (count to 5 before rushing the quarterback etc.), knelt for the National Anthem, and started the game!

OK, I lied about the National Anthem, but the rest is accurate. We played hard, uncoached. In fact, adults or any authority figures would be nuisances. That’s the one constant from that time to the present. The difference is that in our time the nuisances were entirely absent rather than oppressively ever-present.

Rules were passed down; older kids had taught us. The rules were malleable, though, and we often had to negotiate with the other team, who could be guys from different neighborhood with different traditions.

Who calls tags? The tagger or the tagee? In my hood, the athlete making the tag called, “gotcha,” meaning that the one tagging certified that both hands touched the runner’s body at the same time, and the runner was thereby “tackled.” Other teams left the decision to the runner. We had to hash this out, or there wouldn’t be a game.

We improved by playing with older, better players. It was not unusual for a member of the high school varsity team to drop by and offer pointers. Those guys also played choose-up games with kids their own age. In high school I joined them.

Much that is good happens in organized youth sports. Dedicated adults coach and provide solid role models, while parents show up in their children’s lives, a gesture of love and accompaniment that my own children cherished deeply.

A lot of good also occurs when youngsters are given space to enter a world comprised solely of peers, where we had to navigate uncertain terrain and negotiate ways to play the game, solve conflicts, celebrate accomplishments, face losses, and respect the rules needed to keep the contest going.

We played hard and competed passionately, but this world was not one that assigned any particular significance to a win or a loss. I cannot remember a single instance of regret the day after one of those games. Or of exhilaration, for that matter. All that emotion was unleashed on the field, and then left there, permanently.

It was a bracing world where things were not prearranged by adults, so we had to organize ourselves. It was a world where no one got participation trophies, but also a world where no one got any trophies at all. Therefore, the game itself, the joy, the camaraderie, the fights, and the laughs were all there was to motivate us.

It was more than enough.

Lonnie Barone is a consultant, college instructor, and writer. His articles appear regularly in Lonnie Out Loud (https://lonnieoutloud.blogspot.com/). He can be reached at lonnie.barone@gmail.com. Lonnie lives in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

The Hand of Mercy

Take a look at my latest Inquirer article, from March 29, 2015



Thursday, March 5, 2015

Spock, Nimoy, and Logic


“You gotta watch Star Trek,” this friend insisted. It presented an optimistic vision of the future and was attracting a loyal cadre of fans who would one day be called Trekkers. The show had already finished its undistinguished three season run and was in reruns on UHF channel 48, the Philly station largely credited with reviving the now legendary franchise. It still thrives after 50 years. UHF is an unknown acronym for anyone with a Twitter account.

And Leonard Nimoy as the stalwart Mr. Spock has been at the heart of that phenomenon for every one of those years, including in 2013’s Star Trek: Into Darkness. Zachary Quinto is a creditable younger version, but we all know he is not just playing Spock, he is playing Nimoy playing Spock. There is no other access point to that role.

Spock is a cultural fixture in part because of his alien origins — his father hailed from Vulcan, a planet of savages who saved themselves by turning to the discipline of logic. More importantly, he represents the lofty vision of reason guiding behavior, as well as the flawed vision of reason shunning emotion.

In the Star Trek universe, Spock’s strictly logical approach is set against the passion of Dr. McCoy who vociferously decries the Vulcan’s disparagement of emotion, empathy, and caring. Captain Kirk plays the referee, trying with mixed success to get the right mix.

In business consulting, Spock is referenced frequently, especially during personality assessments like the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. The MBTI suggests that people tend to make decisions based on one of two criteria: logic and feeling, objective reason and personal values. Spock is often channeled as the paradigm of decision-making based on logic.

Today the Spocks and McCoys are feuding as volubly as ever. Sometimes the earth itself seems caught up in a pitched battle between those who contend that the victory is to the furious, the violent, the uncompromising and those who want to work it out calmly and rationally.

Leonard Nimoy had a distinguished and varied career as a stage, screen and TV actor, movie director, author, photo artist, and humanitarian. It is his half century of portraying a pointy-eared alien that has earned him immortality.

Vulcans looked down on us poor humans, even bullied Spock, a half-human who had to work twice as hard to conceal his depraved emotional side. Their path to peaceful coexistence was simple submission to the dictates of logic. The price was utter repression of feeling. Spock embodied the promise and the price. His was a tortured soul paddling logically across the surface, sporadically aware of the seditious undertow of friendship, loyalty, and love.

Leonard Nimoy transmitted that inner conflict exquisitely. In an early Star Trek episode he assumes command of the Enterprise and is befuddled that his perfectly rational decisions are ultimately rejected by a crew of humans who require infusions of human feeling from their leaders, even at the cost of the most efficient course of action.

Great leaders in their greatest moments marry clear thinking and deep feeling in ways that stir us, unite us, and carry us through unimagined moments of crisis. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address confronts a civil war’s field of blood; Roosevelt’s First Inaugural confronts a Great Depression; King’s Dream Speech confronts a history of injustice; Reagan’s Challenger Disaster Speech confronts a day of shock and mourning.

Without Spock’s clear, calm logic, all those speeches would have been howls of rage, sorrow, despair, or desolation. Spock’s logic marshals emotion, gives it purpose, and confers nobility and hope.

Through his singular portrayal of a singular character, Leonard Nimoy has left us this legacy, a road to purpose, nobility, and hope. They give his famous salutation its ultimate meaning.

Live long and prosper.